<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does your technology match your values?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jpedia.org/wp/archives/48/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jpedia.org/wp/archives/48</link>
	<description>The future of IT, business, and society on the new web.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darcy Carroll</title>
		<link>http://jpedia.org/wp/archives/48#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Darcy Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpedia.org/wp/archives/48#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I really don't feel like technology needs to match your values or a companies values. It would be nice if they could but a lot of companies that are low on budgets can't affort to have strong values. These strong values will get in the way of them making a profit. Larger and more profitable companies have more leg room when it comes to technology matching values and can afford to make new technology value friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t feel like technology needs to match your values or a companies values. It would be nice if they could but a lot of companies that are low on budgets can&#8217;t affort to have strong values. These strong values will get in the way of them making a profit. Larger and more profitable companies have more leg room when it comes to technology matching values and can afford to make new technology value friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
